I consider this the best way to measure real-world CPU efficiency because comparing the CPU load of different DAWs with the same set of plugins while playing says almost nothing. I have done this a while ago born out of one of the many "DAW wars" in another forum ("no, you're wrong, mine is the best" ) And the max load shows the longest time it took the CPU to calculate a. Of course, it must be smaller than the deadline to avoid clicks. The average load is how long it takes the CPU to compute a block of data. So the result of this test is basically the number of plugins that can be run at a certain audio buffer size. In Bitwig the deadline shows how fast a block of (audio) data must be delivered to the audio card before experiencing buffer underruns. The way I like to do such comparisons is to use a somewhat dated machine with older CPU power, set the audio buffer equally in both, have the same MIDI clip playing (or audio track in case of effect plugins) and load multiple instances of the same plugin until crackling starts to appear. I haven't said that, I've only said that I doubt that it's more efficient. Very surprised to hear that reaper isn't as efficient as ableton for you as ableton is def not one of the most efficient. When I had resource issues (cpu and memory), it was always caused by the plugins themselves and changing the DAW didn't make much of a difference, given you've used the same buffer settings and the same plugins. I appreciate Reaper for its efficiency, flexibility and JS engine that you can script your own plugins (!) but from my own tests I doubt that it's more efficient than Ableton Live - more efficient than Logic maybe but then you'd have to run a Logic version appropriate for the hardware it's running on. Mainly because I couldnt produce any music that I found 'complete' and I thought Bitwig could be an all in one source of inspiration. These days I use either Reaper personally or Pro-Tools professionally.įor everybody on Windows, there's no alternative to Reaper anyway. Answer: I have worked in Cubase since 2002. It also is compatible all the way back to XP and Snow Leopard. You can download on set (if you do on location recording) and setup It is cross platform, can be installed onto a USB key with your precise setup and if all else fails Regular updates, as in every few months at the very least. Though the ,’White Tie’, theme is the best, the sound is on par with That may have changed with the most recent update. Reaper’s disadvantage if you see it as such is that it doesn’t come with loops and the gui for their effects This reduces the CPU load drastically, but it makes it. If you dont see any Plugin Alliance factory presets in Studio One, just go to the Browse window, right-click on the plugin name, and select Refresh. Which are top notch but the way we interact with it slows down creativity. Studio One users: We have discovered an issue with how our presets are recognized by Studio One when a plugin is first installed. Reaper is a very small tightly coded program so everything else is dedicated to audio.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |